Protective due diligence for access and relationship decisions.

Decision-grade due diligence for meetings, counterparties, vendors, investments, and strategic relationships, ending in an explicit disposition and protective controls.

Not a data dump.

Protective due diligence is designed to support a real decision: whether and how to proceed with a meeting, relationship, vendor, investment discussion, introduction, or access request.

House reporting standard

FACTS → ASSESSMENT → DISPOSITION → COUNTERMEASURE → OWNER → NEXT REVIEW

Material facts are separated from reports, unresolved leads, and hypotheses. Findings are evaluated against the purpose of the meeting or transaction, then translated into practical controls.

Potential scope

  • Identity and professional-profile resolution.
  • Entity, corporate, public-record, litigation, media, and reputation review.
  • Open-source and appropriately authorized commercial-source research.
  • Counterparty, vendor, meeting, and relationship risk.
  • Watch items and follow-up requirements.
  • Explicit access disposition and meeting controls.
Source discipline: Global Makarios distinguishes what is verified from what is merely reported and uses source access appropriate to the engagement.

How due diligence supports executive protection

A vendor, introduction or meeting can change a principal’s exposure. Due diligence connects source findings to threat assessment and practical access controls. For travel engagements, it also supports transportation and provider vetting.

Reduce uncertainty before a consequential relationship

Protective due diligence helps decision makers assess relevant concerns around a proposed relationship or engagement. The work should have a defined purpose and distinguish substantiated information from allegations or unresolved questions.

Define a useful engagement

Establish the subject, decision, permitted scope and reporting requirements. A useful result explains what the available evidence supports and what remains uncertain.

Discuss scope in a confidential consultation

Verify the person behind the relationship

Identity checks matter when a convincing video interaction influences a consequential decision. The Project Sable deepfake fraud case study examines why recognition and independent verification serve different purposes.